On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:43 AM Russell Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote:
> On 3/20/20 4:39 PM, Nigel T wrote: > > You guys should have at least trademarked the "open" badge that the > > ESD has now taken). > > You mean the green circle open at the bottom? We did trademark that, and > registered it. Can you link to where they are using the "open" badge? > No I mean the "open" part of the open/ethical badge. https://img.shields.io/badge/open-ethical-%234baaaa <https://img.shields.io/badge/open-ethical-%234baaaa>It clearly intended to imply that those license are open source and they aren't. open/permissive open/share-alike Would have been two nice badges to have no?
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
