On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:08 PM McCoy Smith <mc...@lexpan.law> wrote:
> From which, I would conclude, the winners got substantial majorities of > the voters, and no one else did, even if we combine candidates based on > platforms. So they really deserve a seat at the table; everyone else, > probably not. > If OSI is to be the custodian of open source, it needs to be representative of the open source community at large. Not based on a winner takes model, which is, by definition, not representative. --tobie
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
