> On Mar 18, 2020, at 12:46 PM, Brian Behlendorf <br...@behlendorf.com> wrote:
>
>
> Any long term community or institution unwilling to occasionally reconsider
> any of its core principles is one doomed to eventual irrelevance. The U.S.
> Constitution has been successfully amended 27 times, with the first ten of
> them (the Bill of Rights) happening only 2 years after, the most recent one
> ratified in 1992 (203 years after first being proposed! now that must have
> been an epic thread.)
>
First of all, I don't think anyone is saying that the OSD is written in stone,
sacrosanct, and immune from reconsideration. And yes, the U.S. Constitution has
been amended over the years, but most of those are procedural changes and
modifications, or clarifications of confusion. A relatively small number of
those fundamentally change core principles, and one, which was made almost
specifically due to "moral" reasons, was soon overturned (prohibition). So the
2 comparisons are not quite exact.
For me, the biggest issue with ethical open source is that the very fact that
such licenses leave certain key questions (and answers) open to interpretation
are their basic failings. This introduces inherent risk for the end-user
because although you might be confident that you are not a persona-non-grata,
it really isn't up to you to make that determination. And any wiggle-room, any
confusion, will be an impediment for license adoption as well as project
adoption for those that use such languages (look at all the endless debates
regarding copyleft licenses regarding what is distribution and what is a
derivative work).
IMO, one of the underlying principles is that there be as little wiggle-room,
as little aspects open for interpretation as possible, and that is why certain
aspects of the OSD are written as they are; they create to create bright clear
lines in a world of gray nebulosity.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
