> There is no mutual ground for discussionI'm glad you've come to such a
> decisive conclusion. If you don't mind, we all get to make that decision for
> ourselves as well as when to stop soliciting feedback. If you have nothing to
> add or feel it is not compatible, that's fine you may be right but others may
> have more or other viewpoints to support your claim, or not. Last I checked
> this was a discussion not a trial.
-------- Original message --------From: Russell Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com>
Date: 2020-03-11 9:35 p.m. (GMT-05:00) To:
license-discuss@lists.opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on
the subject of ethical licenses On 3/11/20 8:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:> didn't
ever really discuss> the merits of ethical clauses (or lack thereof).Yes, I
did. Went through all of them one by one, showing that they were not compatible
with the OSD, and analyzed the idea of putting restrictions on the USE of
software versus the DISTRIBUTION of software. No response from Coraline. Why
not? Because the ESD's very *goal* is contrary to the goal of the OSD.There is
no mutual ground for
discussion._______________________________________________License-discuss
mailing
listLicense-discuss@lists.opensource.orghttp://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
