I'd second the push for the use of a tool like discourse especially in a mode
like mailing list mode to grant everyone part of what they want eg. The ability
to continue using an email client and mailing list emails as well as a more
modern method of contributing and learning from previous discussions.
-------- Original message --------From: Josh Berkus <j...@berkus.org> Date:
2020-03-11 8:40 p.m. (GMT-05:00) To: Gil Yehuda <gyeh...@verizonmedia.com>
Cc: Gil Yehuda via License-discuss <license-discuss@lists.opensource.org>
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subject of ethical licenses On
3/11/20 4:33 PM, Gil Yehuda wrote:> > My current feeling is disappointment in
the conversation and I'm less> enthusiastic about seeing this play out. Largely
because I think they> are looking to achieve a different goal. They may be
relieved that I'll> ask fewer questions and make fewer suggestions, too. I'm
disappointed in the discussion too, but in my case because itfocused entirely
on historical baggage and didn't ever really discussthe merits of ethical
clauses (or lack thereof).> You are right, OSD is not immutable. But this is
the license-discuss> list, not the OSD-discuss list, nor the ESD-discuss list.
Maybe that's> too fine a point, and I'm sure (and hope) other people on this
list are> less interested in discussing if I was sufficiently articulate and>
measured in my words. Sorry to distract from the conversation.There isn't an
OSD-discuss list. This is it.That's one reason why I would be thrilled to see
OSI move to Discourseor a similar platform; I think it would really help us
separatediscussions better.-- Josh
Berkus_______________________________________________License-discuss mailing
listLicense-discuss@lists.opensource.orghttp://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
