Josh thank you. This topic is very important and we're all passionate about it. Written text in email groups is notoriously bad for conveying nuance. I was hoping to come across more balanced than perhaps I did. My essential message is that as a discussion list we're most effective toward our goals when we focus on improving *open source* licensing.
Gil Yehuda: I help with external technology engagement On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:50 PM Josh Berkus <j...@berkus.org> wrote: > On 3/11/20 1:09 PM, Russell McOrmond wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:42 AM Josh Berkus <j...@berkus.org > > <mailto:j...@berkus.org>> wrote: > > > > Coraline showed *tremendous* patience with a list discussion not > exactly > > marked by good faith or good manners on the part of at least half the > > posts. Your attempt to portray her as some kind of villian for > leaving > > the list should be well beneath the dignity of a senior manager. If > > nothing else, it reflects poorly on your employer. > > > > > > Please be aware that your reply reads as partisan anger at someone you > > have a political disagreement with, and questioning someones dignity or > > ethics because of a political disagreement is not remotely good manners. > > My apologies to Gil Yehuda and everyone else. I was shocked by some of > what was in his post and got carried away. > > (For the record, I don't actually support the ethical license concept.) > > -- > Josh Berkus > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
