Bruce Perens via License-discuss dixit: >My opinion has been that gift-style licensing makes you an unpaid, and >unappreciated, employee of big companies.
Definitely not. Employees get told what they can work on, how it should look in the end, and often enough how to work on it. With Ⓕ Copyfree licences, I can choose myself, enjoy myself, scratch my own itch, and I’m happy if I can help other people with it. Yes, I was angry when Ubuntu got 10 million dollars and I was broke enough I couldn’t immediately afford a new coffee machine when mine broke around the same time. But no, using a copyleft licence would not have fixed that. Incidentally, mksh’s success was determined mostly from it *not* being under a copyleft licence. Also, we’re standing on the shoulders of giants. It is not appropriate for us to do anything else than publish what we’ve been doing there under similarily liberal terms. bye, //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org