Dne petek, 07. december 2018 ob 06:22:41 CET je Richard Fontana napisal(a): > I suggest we continue to think of the International category as > encompassing licenses "targeting specific languages and > jurisdictions", to use Mike's phrasing from 2015, rather than > the typical approach we see in open source licensing of having > a single English-language text that is largely perceived by the > community, correctly or not, as being jurisdiction-neutral in > design or orientation.
Just for clarification, is this more about language or jurisdiction (or both)? Say, for example that there is a fictive FOSS license that would be written in English, yet have Malta as its jurisdiction …or, even more confusingly, be written in English and have the UK (or US) as its jurisdiction? cheers, Matija -- gsm: +386 41 849 552 www: http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org sip: matija_suk...@ippi.fr _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
