Quoting Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de): > I’d not write a new licence for this. Rather, I’d do this over the > licence _grant_. The grant could just say: commercial licence A applies, > and on 2023-07-30, open source licence X (or X, Y or Z; or any OSI- > approved licence; whatever you chose above) is also granted on the work.
_Much_ better idea. Further on this to Mr. Dupuy, the querent: Part of the price of using a one-off and complicated licence is that a broad cross-section of the intended audience are very likely to just ignore the codebase entirely, as alternatives without strange terms of use eliminate a whole class of problems ab initio. So, just state as copyright holder that the work is available under the terms of licence A starting $DATE1, and also state as copyright holder that the work is available under the terms of licence A starting $DATE2. Done. -- Cheers, Romana: "I don't think we should interfere." Rick Moen The Doctor: "Interfere?" Of course we should interfere. r...@linuxmafia.com Always do what you're best at, that's what I say." McQ! (4x80) -- Doctor Who, "Nightmare of Eden" _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
