For example, the user was not aware that there was a libxml2 under the /usr/X11R6 tree as well as under the /usr/lib tree. LibMagick was apparently built and tested with the libxml2 under /usr/X11R6.
I may be exposing more ignorance here, but that is not what I meant. At least in my case it seems (am I wrong?), that LibMagick was built with the libxml2 which was originally under /usr/lib. Thus my
This does seem wrong. As the author of ImageMagick's configure script, I can tell you that the configure script uses settings from whatever xml2-config script is discovered via the executable search path so it is quite easy for a maintainer's environment to pick up and use the wrong libxml2. Feel free to blame that on bad design. :-(
This is worth reporting as a bug to your ImageMagick package maintainer.
Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
