On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:11:16 -0500 (CDT) Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > > > > I may be exposing more ignorance here, but that is not > > what I meant. At least in my case it seems (am I > > wrong?), that LibMagick was built with the libxml2 which > > was originally under /usr/lib. Thus my > > This does seem wrong. As the author of ImageMagick's > configure script, I can tell you that the configure script > uses settings from whatever xml2-config script is > discovered via the executable search path so it is quite > easy for a maintainer's environment to pick up and use the > wrong libxml2. Feel free to blame that on bad design. :-( > > This is worth reporting as a bug to your ImageMagick > package maintainer. Thanks, - at least this one is not my fault because my ImageMagick is unchanged from the original Slack 9.1 install (/var/log/packages/imagemagick-5.5.7_10-i486-1). I guess, therefore, that I should notify Pat Volkerding. Geoff _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
