On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:02:16PM +0100, Geoff wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:47:53 -0500 (CDT) > Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Unknowledgable is not the same as unintelligent. > > Thank-you for saving my blushes.
usually two things that have 'and' between them are recognized by context as being two distinct things. I do, however, consider it a sign of intelligence to try to understand how things work. > > For > > example, the user was not aware that there was a libxml2 > > under the /usr/X11R6 tree as well as under the /usr/lib > > tree. LibMagick was apparently built and tested with the > > libxml2 under /usr/X11R6. > > I may be exposing more ignorance here, but that is not what > I meant. At least in my case it seems (am I wrong?), that > LibMagick was built with the libxml2 which was > originally under/usr/lib. Thus my > /usr/X11R6/lib/libMagick.la has : yes, this makes perfect sense. > # Libraries that this one depends upon. > dependency_libs=' -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib -ltiff > /usr/lib/libfreetype.la -ljpeg -lpng /usr/lib/libexif.la > -ldpstk -ldps -lXt -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 > /usr/lib/libxml2.la -lz -lpthread -lm -ldl' > > This is the only libMagick.la on my system. and if you have only one libxml2.$shared_ext, then there should be no problem with it being in /usr/lib, or /opt/xml2/lib, or wherever, so long as you realize that you may need to give the linker a hint as to where to find it. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
