> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Matz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:05 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bruce Korb; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Fwd: ltmain.in]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > > current g++ version (not to speak of proprietary compilers) which
> > > need that explicit linking. Instead a simple "g++ -shared -o
> > > libbla.so works". Well, yes, those only having a static libstdc++
> > > are screwed, but so what?
> >
> > Well that's quite a few of us (cygwin, mingw)!
>
> Hmm, yes. But I'm not even sure, you're screwed at all.
> Does g++ -shared the right thing for you? I guess not, as
> g++ anyway can't produce DLL's on it's own, or? Doesn't it
> anyway need a special tool? I.e. does libtool without the
> pre-/postdeps work on cygwin, or not?
Ah, that's a deeper question, I was simply address the fact that we
don't have a shared libg++.a.
I'll have to look when I get some time at the pre-/postdeps stuff for
cygwin.
Rob
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
