I found that freebsd is hacking all the ltmain.sh-es to get roughly the same behavior that netbsd is already getting. Any objections to putting something along these lines into ltmain.in? (Obviously changing /usr/bin/false to something conditional on not being freebsd.)
> --- config/ltmain.sh.orig Mon Sep 3 18:24:41 2001 > +++ config/ltmain.sh Thu Dec 6 03:24:42 2001 > @@ -2408,6 +2408,9 @@ > *-*-netbsd*) > # Don't link with libc until the a.out ld.so is fixed. > ;; > + *-*-freebsd*) > + # FreeBSD doesn't need this... > + ;; > *) > # Add libc to deplibs on all other systems if necessary. > if test $build_libtool_need_lc = "yes"; then > @@ -4175,10 +4178,12 @@ > fi > > # Install the pseudo-library for information purposes. > + if /usr/bin/false; then > name=`$echo "X$file" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%'` > instname="$dir/$name"i > $show "$install_prog $instname $destdir/$name" > $run eval "$install_prog $instname $destdir/$name" || exit $? > + fi > > # Maybe install the static library, too. > test -n "$old_library" && staticlibs="$staticlibs > $dir/$old_library" -- Bruce Korb <first initial + last name at gnu dot org> AG URL: http://autogen.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
