On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I found that freebsd is hacking all the ltmain.sh-es to get > > roughly the same behavior that netbsd is already getting. > > Any objections to putting something along these lines into > > ltmain.in? (Obviously changing /usr/bin/false to something > > conditional on not being freebsd.) > > Looks good to me. Please apply the same change to all live branches though!
On a related note. How long do we want to support that cruft at all? I mean the pre- and postdeps. Objects and libraries. I'm not aware of any current g++ version (not to speak of proprietary compilers) which need that explicit linking. Instead a simple "g++ -shared -o libbla.so works". Well, yes, those only having a static libstdc++ are screwed, but so what? Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
