Hi Lionel, *; On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane <lio...@mamane.lu> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:53:37AM +0100, Noel Power wrote: >> On 13/06/14 11:45, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:44:42AM +0100, Noel Power wrote: > >>>> But, as I see this morning this discussion is a waste of my time, >>>> seems that this change was already in, why even bother asking for >>>> an opinion in the first place, unfortunately I find I am not >>>> surprised > >>> No, it is not a waste of time; > >> well actually I beg to differ, (...) I'm done with this. > > I'm sorry we are losing your input on the design of the long-term > solution in master (as opposed to the stop-gap that went in).
I think we already settled on this one? i.e. make it a bundled extension (as it should have been in the first place). > [...] > What is intended to become accepted behaviour, at a higher level, is that > access2base can be upgraded "out of cycle", by the admin and/or user, > in LibreOffice. Not the particular way in which it is done. And that is why it should be an extension and that overriding the bundled stuff should stay the exception. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
