On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:55:05AM +0100, Noel Power wrote:
>> In the binary case the possibilities should be clear. But even if >> Libreoffice didn't ship any basic libraries as part of the core it >> wouldn't change the fact that enterprises normally deploy all of >> their macros in share, I doubt they would wish that a user could >> 'override' any libraries (including Access2Base that possibly some >> of their macros have a dependency on) > Enterprises are free, if they so wish, to forbid their employees to > install an extension that overrides a part of core, or otherwise > override a part of LibreOffice core. FWIIW, an enterprise could also wish to deploy a newer Access2Base version without upgrading to LibreOffice Fresh (because they are enterprise, they want Stable), because it suits their newly developed macros better... And then doing it by a system-wide extension is much better than having to recompile the whole of LibreOffice. -- Lionel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
