On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:05 AM, David Tardon <dtar...@redhat.com> wrote: > IMHO there are just two alternatives: Either the code is "ours", in > which case it should be an optional component and should only be updated > together with libreoffice. Or it is external, in which case the sources > should not be duplicated in our repo, but the project should be treated > as another one of the dozen extensions we allow to bundle. That means, > download the .oxt during build, unpack it, put it to instdir and be done > with it. (This is directly supported by gbuild, using > gb_ExtensionPackageSet).
FWIW, after reading this thread, I concurs with the above. The current expressed 'problem' seems a self inflicted wound, due to wanting to become 'a core part of Libreoffice' while not wanting to follow the consequences associated with that status. Norbert --- Tu ne peux pas avoir le beurre, l'argent du beurre (et la cremiere) _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
