On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 01/06/12 15:01, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com> wrote:
>>> * Quality of round-robin patch review (Markus) >>> + often generalists review specific patches for master >>> + gerrit should be able to help (Norbert) >>> + queueing and checking them >>> + one-day timeout from gerrit: if no protest, >>> auto-merge to master. >> For the record: I did not suggest, nor do I support that last point. > iirc that auto-merge was only for commits from authors who have commit > rights anyway, not for patch submissions from new and inexperienced > people which is what the topic was about. Ah, that's very different. So essentially people that now have immediate gratification^W commit rights would "go back" to "one day delay"? I'm not a very auditory-oriented person (and I came late to the party), so I might have misunderstood, but when I said "one day is short to review a patch", I specifically remember MMeeks saying something to the effect: "one day waiting period is a lot for eager new contributors". I think I thought this was about requests to apply a commit *already* in master to stable branch. -- Lionel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
