On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:02:43AM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > Do I see the beginning of some "CWS" process here?
BTW, the main trouble with the CWS process was that it required the changes to completely resolve some random bug description (aka. what some non-developer dreamed up to be his pet solution), plus the broken QA processes. That should never be the criteria for inclusion of a commit. Nor should it be "would I do it different?". The only question to ask would be: "Is is better than what we have right now?". Questions regarding the "bigger picture" should not be discussed on one specific commit. They belong on the mailing list/ESC. If gerrit helps us detect conflicting development early, that is a Good Thing(tm): Its better to align efforts early rather that late (when two conflicting efforts are already half done, and one has to be thrown away/redone). Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
