Hi Michael, On Tuesday, 2011-10-25 14:32:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > However, the naming question remains for future functions not (yet) > > defined by ODF. > > Quite. > > > Certainly it should not be ORG.OPENOFFICE.FOO, IMHO it should be > > ORG.LIBREOFFICE.FOO instead of ORG.DOCUMENTFOUNDATION.FOO, i.e. > > specify the implementation. > > I hope we are talking file-format issues here, not user presentation. Yes, of course, only the ODF name. > If there is only one 'FRAC' function, I would expect us to render it as > 'FRAC' in the UI, and simply mangle it internally on parse / export - is > that what you're proposing ?. Yep, we're already doing that for some functions, see formula/source/core/resource/core_resource.src section RID_STRLIST_FUNCTION_NAMES_ENGLISH_ODFF where we have several ORG.OPENOFFICE.* and even one COM.MICROSOFT.BAHTTEXT Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
pgpzZWat7dNy6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
