On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> However, the naming question remains for future functions not (yet)
> defined by ODF.
Quite.
> Certainly it should not be ORG.OPENOFFICE.FOO, IMHO it should be
> ORG.LIBREOFFICE.FOO instead of ORG.DOCUMENTFOUNDATION.FOO, i.e.
> specify the implementation.
I hope we are talking file-format issues here, not user presentation.
If there is only one 'FRAC' function, I would expect us to render it as
'FRAC' in the UI, and simply mangle it internally on parse / export - is
that what you're proposing ?. Clearly if there are several alternatives
offering the most interoperable in the UI, and allowing some hideous
specification of the precise one if unavoidable might be good (?).
But of course, it'd be nice to see some org.libreoffice goodness :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
