On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 07:36 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > 2011/10/6 Radek Doulík <r...@novell.com>: > > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 06:30 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> 2011/10/6 Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>: > >> > 2011/10/6 Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>: > >> >> 2011/10/6 Radek Doulík <r...@novell.com>: > >> >>> > >> >>> OTOH, we would need first to see how much would -O0 save for the whole > >> >>> build. > >> >> > >> >> I'll give it a shot... > >> > > >> > Not that I expect it to make a big difference... since most of the > >> > compiles are ccached... > >> > >> As I suspected. changing to -O0 yield no significant difference on a > >> 'cache hot' tinderbox. > >> > >> But on Windows that may be worth it, since it does not use ccache. > > > > OK, I have meanwhile split the big .cxx file into 6 smaller ones and > > pushed. Largest file has around 750k, so hopefully it should not choke > > tinderboxes anymore. > > well they seems to go in a loop, most likely due to a bug in gbuild > that send the make in a endless look when one try to compile a file > that does not exist... > are you sure of commit > d05649c43b41c20a15677982e0942be8ac796753 ?
Sorry, should be fixed now. (the .mk file, not the gbuild) Cheers Radek _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
