On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 04:13 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > One thing I noticed. It might be useful to run tinderboxes without gcc > > optimization (ie. with -O0). It makes huge difference in compile time - > > more than 10 times faster on my system and could make the tinderbox > > turnaround much faster. > > Yes, but the generated daily build would be less usefull that way and > possibly hide optimisation-induced bug until the last minute.
I thought the point of tinderboxes was to check quickly whether the tree is buildable and report failure if not. I would consider differences between whether an optimized or a non-optimized compilation would complete to be compiler bug and ignore these. IMO, I would prefer quicker turnarounds. Even more when the turnaround can be in order of 10 hours. OTOH, we would need first to see how much would -O0 save for the whole build. Cheers Radek _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
