2011/10/6 Radek Doulík <r...@novell.com>: > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 04:13 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> > One thing I noticed. It might be useful to run tinderboxes without gcc >> > optimization (ie. with -O0). It makes huge difference in compile time - >> > more than 10 times faster on my system and could make the tinderbox >> > turnaround much faster. >> >> Yes, but the generated daily build would be less usefull that way and >> possibly hide optimisation-induced bug until the last minute. > > I thought the point of tinderboxes was to check quickly whether the tree > is buildable and report failure if not. I would consider differences > between whether an optimized or a non-optimized compilation would > complete to be compiler bug and ignore these. IMO, I would prefer > quicker turnarounds. Even more when the turnaround can be in order of 10 > hours. > > OTOH, we would need first to see how much would -O0 save for the whole > build.
I'll give it a shot... Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
