On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Andras Timar <tima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> The issue is in the decision to backport the first patch without the > >>> configuration option (fdo#81309 only) to 4.3.1 and 4.2.7 > >> > >> It was because of the translation requirement that the backport would > >> add. > > > > do we really have to make ourselves slaves to un-changeable processes > > like "there shall be no new strings in bugfix releases", no matter the > > circumstances? > > AFAIK there is no policy like "there shall be no new strings in bugfix > releases". The only thing localizers and Pootle maintaners ask, that > such change should be announced to them, so they have a chance to > catch-up. > Can that be done automatically by some script (like in GNOME)? Simos
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
