On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> The issue is in the decision to backport the first patch without the >>> configuration option (fdo#81309 only) to 4.3.1 and 4.2.7 >> >> It was because of the translation requirement that the backport would >> add. > > do we really have to make ourselves slaves to un-changeable processes > like "there shall be no new strings in bugfix releases", no matter the > circumstances?
AFAIK there is no policy like "there shall be no new strings in bugfix releases". The only thing localizers and Pootle maintaners ask, that such change should be announced to them, so they have a chance to catch-up. Of course it is desired that string changes in stable branches should be minimal. But bugfixes can always be accepted. Regards, Andras _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
