On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 10:14 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We could, but we refer to the first build. I wouldn't think that this > change is necessary. However, I didn't think the change to pass 1 was > unclear either. The change already made was to prevent users from > assuming things that were not stated. I'd think that if they would > recognize that this was the same. > > Let's wait to see if we get any questions on this.
Fair enough. I don't recall that we've ever had much problem with this in pass2 before anyway - I suppose that you're right, that the instructions are familiar by the time they reach that point. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
