On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:44:22PM +0200, Denis Mugnier wrote: > On 04/04/2014 18:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Denis Mugnier wrote: > >> > >> It is possible to integrate eudev on the BLFS book to provide a solution > >> without the systemd package? > > Not without changing the flow. I understand the yucky feeling you get > > when installing something you don't really want, but what does it really > > cost? A few MBs and SBUs. > yes, a few MBs and SBUs when it is easy for you to build LFS. But a > majority of users build LFS only one time, to learn how an operating > system work. For them, it is difficult to understand why they want to > install systemd when they want to use SystemV. The mirror image is that > systemd is inevitable, systemd is an obligation. > > And the BLFS book ? Each package will be validate if LFS is running with > systemd or if LFS is running with systemV ? > FWIW, I've been building systems using eudev since it was first announced (my notes are in the list archive - people later found out that my method didn't build the /dev/disk-by-id [ I think ] part - on a desktop I rebuild eudev for gudev, and that second build fixes the problem after that [ but too late if you need it at boot time ].
What was in the book apparently solves the problem [ I haven't tested that part ]. > > > I did have a private email with a volunteer to write a hint. If I get > > that, I'll add a note in the systemd section that points there. > > > If this hint is released, it will be a pleasure for me to release a > french translation ;o) > If whoever it was wishes to contact me about this, feel free. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
