On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:46:13AM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> OK so LFS doesn't use anymore sysvinit, but Systemd. I thought the book 
> 9ould use an approach like the CLFS one: one chapter if you use Systemd; 
> one if sysvinit (in CLFS: if you chroot; if you reboot). Given that the 
> choice is at runtime or config time, and not at install time, I think 
> the foreword could be changed. First because LFS isn't easily 
> installable on a very little system, Systemd is very big. Then, the 
> teaching approach seems very different now: are you sure it stays really 
> easy to learn a system? Is the pedagogic purpose still really reached?
> 
> Regards,
> 
 I think you've misunderstood the changes - my understanding is that
Bruce is using systemd to provide udev (as well as all of the other
things which come from systemd), but keeping sysvinit.  And,
importantly, using sysvinit as the default.  But with scripts to
allow the builder to change to systemd, and to change back to
sysvinit (after he or she has seen the error of their ways ;-)

 As to the size in the foreword - I think you are probably correct.
I think the size was correct a long time ago, but I suspect that it
has been a lot bigger for several years - I haven't been interested
in a minimal build for a long time, and I normally only build
x86_64, so I've no idea what space a reasonable current minimum
system would use.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to