Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Seriously, I don't believe in multiboot. If I can't build a 64-bit >> version of a package, then I don't need it. I should be able to put >> libraries in the directories I want. > > Well, you are, of course, but this appears to be nothing more than > fallout from violating the assumptions of all the various other packages > -- in this case, that a 64-bit-mode link requires the .la files from > /usr/lib64.
Then, as you have said, it should look there first. >> It would be easier to edit /usr/bin/libtool to just not output the >> warning. It's even easier to delete the .la files. > > Maybe, but fixing the default source path feels more right to me. > Shrug, either way. :-) Yes, but I think multilib is a hack anyway. It's only purpose is to run binaries that have not been compiled as 64-bit. Rebuilding all binaries as 64-bit feels even more right to me. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
