On 27 July 2010 16:01, Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote:
> It's interesting what logs will show. > > For instance, the access logs for community.linuxfromscratch.org show 117 > unique IP addresses viewing the site yesterday, and 76 unique IPs today. > Combine the two lists and there are a total of 167 unique IPs. Even taking > into account robots and individuals viewing the site from multiple locations, > that's still a lot of readers who were curious enough about it to go have a > look. > > And yet, we have very few people writing in to express their opinion. So it > appears that either they don't really care, or they're holding back from > speaking their mind because of some expectation of what will happen > when they do. > > I find that very interesting. And very unfortunate. As an occasional poster, serial reader and one-time contributer of something to the (old ?) Wiki (regarding GnuCash and a minimal Gnome 1.X), I have to say that I can't see why you need a new website, so have not visited the new website. Perhaps, for many/most people who use/follow *LFS, it's just another website, assuming they just don't go straight to the on-line book itself. If you change to the new website, they'll evetually find their way around that in the same way that they do all across the "web", everytime some institution decides they need a new website. For the core developers though, there are, of course, some tools behind the website. I appreciate that the core developers might want new project-control facilities behind the scenes but would hope that they could still keep those scenes, the website, looking the same. A rhetorical question: Why should you need to change your website just because you decide to change from say Trac to Git(orious) as the project-control engine behind the scenes. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
