On 16 April 2010 21:39, Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote: > On Mar 19, 2010, at 3:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: >>> Yeah, I guess I didn't really make my point clear. What I was trying to >>> say was that I'm >>> not sure the overhead of having both trac and plone is worth it for our >>> relatively small >>> site. If trac is 'good enough' for our needs, then let's just use that. >> >> As I've said, whatever you decide, it's really up to you guys. If you all >> like the design >> (so far it seems pretty positive), I'd be happy to help you implement >> whatever you >> want to do. > > So... where does this stand? > > -- > JH > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > I didn't comment earlier, but I find the blue and green backgrounds too dark (at the bottom - the top is ok), which surprisingly makes them slightly hard to read on my LCD. Note that my monitor is set to a much lower brightness than the default, so that I can look at phots and get a reasonable idea of how they'll print.
But not a showstopper. I could say I prefer the simplicity of the current design, but I'd probably be showing my age, and anyway it's not *my* lawn :) But if it was up for discussion, something like the slashdot pink ponies might look good - then we could spend hours arguing about which shade of pink. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
