Sebastian Plotz wrote: > What about changing from Sysklogd to syslog-ng? > > - syslog-ng is under active development > - sysklogd is quiet old (last version released in 2007) > - we just need to run one daemon (instead of syslogd and klogd)
See http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/syslog-ng.txt We were using syslog-ng in the book around 2005, but the editors at the time determined that it wasn't stable enough. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-February/050622.html I liked the ability to customize the configuration. On the other hand, sysklog works well. Most users don't need the extra configuration. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
