Are there any arguments against using rsyslog in LFS? You may say "Sysklogd does it's job. So why changing something?" ...
But then we could say "GRUB Legacy does it's job. So why upgrading to GRUB 2?", too. In my opinion, LFS should be a modern and up-to-date distribution. But the code of Sysklogd is not maintained anymore. If we're deciding to use rsyslog, this may help a bit: http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/x86/final-system/rsyslog.html ... Another good solution might be dropping out Sysklogd and using syslogd from the Inetutils package instead. This implemenation can process kernel messages, too. And we just need to keep one daemon running. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
