On Tuesday 06 July 2010 22:57:02 Stuart Stegall wrote: > ... > > There are probably more, but I believe they rather universally > rejected syslog-ng. (A few did switch from sysklogd to syslog-ng then > to rsyslog.) > > Fedora has some rationale arguments against syslog-ng here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRsyslog > > That said, sysklogd works just fine.
syslog-ng looks like bloatware, at least if you don't monitor hundreds of hosts. I hope LFS don't plan to build specialized system for monitoring/administration. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
