Andrew Benton wrote: > On 24/05/10 07:50, Kevin Buckley wrote: >> I have little issue with repeating an install of an LFS package within >> BLFS when/if one goes "Beyond" the facilities that LFS really requires >> of a given package. >> >> I am sure that that approach was the LFS vogue at one point and >> was trying to think of similar example packages (basic build in LFS, >> enhanced build in BLFS) but nothing sprang to mind, though I am >> sure there was something (possibly net-tools, or similar, related?) >> once upon a time, assuming there no longer is anything. >> > > Udev and gcc are two packages that spring to mind. They're installed in LFS > with basic functionality but can be reinstalled in BLFS with enhancements.
And vim. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
