On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote: > On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> No problem. I think the idea of a hint is appropriate, but we haven't >> heard from you for a long time. I didn't know if you were up to speed on >> the decision we made. > > Yeah, thanks. I needed a serious break. It was good that I did, too. I have > been able to get a lot of my priorities arranged correctly and things are > generally doing well. > > Off and on I've been doing some work on a personal project: essentially a > distro based loosely on LFS/DIY/CLFS using rpm as a package manager > (although, there's been nothing distributed yet). I say loosely because it's > really just the initial build environment that is bootstrapped, and my > scripts for doing that don't quite match any of the above. The focus is to > provide a solid, minimal system for use as an application server. There's no > deadlines with it, so I take my time. I was surprised at how useful rpm > actually is at solidifying the final build, and at forcing you to think about > where all the files are going. Anyway, that's how I came across this > particular issue. > >> I did read 'Changes for LFS' as a suggestion to >> change the book. You probably didn't intend that. > > Yeah, sorry. Intended only as a reference for what was needed to reproduce > the error. > > -- > JH > --
Old, a bit stale, but I began such a hint. (Only chapter 5 so far) http://nathancoulson.com/proj_lfs.shtml. Unfortunately I took a step backwards to make it work by going to the previous build system. I recall someone mentioning that sysroot would be a better solution... -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ Location: Brittish Columbia, Canada Timezone: PST (-8) Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
