On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> Greetings Everyone, >> >> I know LFS to date hasn't really expressed much interest in adding in >> support for multilib builds, but I figured I'd send out the FYI for >> anyone out there who has been experimenting or would like to do so in >> the future. (The very minor changes LFS needs in order to build >> multilib are listed at the end). > > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2491#comment:6
I am aware of your stance on multilib, Bruce. Due to LFS's limited active developers, I agree, adding in multilib right now for LFS wouldn't be very beneficial. Which is why I never suggested that you do that. :) The post was meant as an FYI for anyone currently experimenting on that front and a request for any feedback from those who have or are interested in finding an answer. The 'Changes for LFS' section on the bottom was intended as a hint for anyone willing to experiment using LFS dev as a base. If that makes this post off-topic for this list, then my apologies, but the last I knew, since lfs-hackers was killed, this was also the list intended for experimental discussion. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
