Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > The post was meant as an FYI for anyone currently experimenting on > that front and a request for any feedback from those who have or are > interested in finding an answer. The 'Changes for LFS' section on the > bottom was intended as a hint for anyone willing to experiment using > LFS dev as a base. If that makes this post off-topic for this list, > then my apologies, but the last I knew, since lfs-hackers was killed, > this was also the list intended for experimental discussion.
No problem. I think the idea of a hint is appropriate, but we haven't heard from you for a long time. I didn't know if you were up to speed on the decision we made. I did read 'Changes for LFS' as a suggestion to change the book. You probably didn't intend that. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page