Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:46:31AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: >> Did anyone investigate the boot loader options further? What should be done >> for >> LFS-7.0? > > Based on what I've read, I vote for switching to LILO as the default. > This has the advantage of making things easier for bringing x86_64 > support into LFS, that is, if we're still wantint to do that for 7.0. > > Might still be alright to mention grub (and maybe even grub2) in the > book but list the pros and cons for each and why we chose LILO as the > default.
My position is that we should stay with grup 0.97 and the compatible version of e2fsprogs until upstream gets the problems worked out. Of course, not using the most recent packages will require a note in the book explaining the issue. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
