On 9/25/06, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For jhalfs, first we must to make mandatory the linux kernel package download (at this moment the kernel download/build is optional to allow folks to upgrade their kernel sources using patches). Then we will need to map the new headers page script name to the kernel package name, to can unpack it. Maybe some other fix could be needed, but we can't know until see the commands on that new page.
(More appropriate for alfs-discuss) I've been thinking about this for a while. Is there any reason why jhalfs doesn't use the $package-url entity to find out the tarball instead of assuming that there is a 1:1 mapping between package and tarball? With a small shell function (or xsl if it's easier), you could strip out the tarball name and figure out the directory (approximately using tar -tf $tarball | head -n1). Then you could get rid of the ugliness in get_package_tarball_name() and get_sources(). If you think it could be done, I'd be glad to work on it. I think this could also be done as a make function. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
