On Sun, May 28, at 10:20:11 Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ag Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 05/28/06 10:15 CST: > > > The total absence of CLFS issues in BLFS. > > You are flat wrong here. It has been explained why BLFS cannot > support CLFS issues in the book. > Then saw me the link to the desired info, If you don't,can (you or Bruce) say to the rest of us (which we don't know these reasons),why the CLFS issues are not covered by BLFS at all?
And which is the general plan? Because I suppose there is a such plan... or I am wrong,there is a plan,is it? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page