On Sun, May 28, at 09:59:31 Jim Gifford wrote:
> Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
> >No it's not the same.
> >The links to the specific packages (that are marked as problematics,and
> >the CLFS team has already info),I say it again....
> >The links to the specific packages they have to redirect the readers INTO
> >the
> >BOOK and not outside.
> >
> >I think they worth some advertisement direct from the Blfs book.
> >It's a major part of our community and they spend a lot of work on CLFS
> >project,
> >and in a lot of other activities too (LFS,Live-cd,jhalfs,bugzilla etc...).
> >
> >So I believe they deserve some special treatment from BLFS.
> >
>
> The only differences are for multilib and some of the architectures
> require config.sub and config.guess updates.
>
> But, on the multilib stuff a simple informative information about how to
> use --libdir, could solve it, granted --libdir isn't used by some
> packages, but the 95% of them use it.
Then even better,one or 2 pages would fit all that information.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
