El Domingo, 28 de Mayo de 2006 00:00, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Because I don't think the proposed method of dealing with the rules is > beneficial to the LFS book, relative to the current organisation. I've > already described how the books and bootscripts are handled (and it > seems most agree that the current separation works well). I don't see > why udev rules need to follow a different process than the books and > bootscripts.
Facts: The CLFS team don't want to depend on the LFS team to have available the base udev-rules and bootscripts tarballs. You don't want that a separate team take care of maintain and creating full udev-rules and bootscripts tarballs containing the base one, to be used in LFS, plus any addition/changes required by CLFS or HLFS. If no one change their postures, the unification is impossible :-/ -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
