Tushar Teredesai wrote:
No there should not be any duplication. LFS would have the base udev
rules and bootscripts. CLFS, HLFS and BLFS would add to it with their
unique modifications. The approach has worked nicely for the
bootscripts, the same would work for udev rules.
I totally disagree, the udev rules and bootscripts need to be maintained
by neutral parties, that are not involved with the politics of each of
the books. CLFS has guidelines we follow, and LFS has guidelines they
follow. By the scripts and udev rules being maintained by a third party
these guidelines that make each of the books different can be decided by
a neutral third party, and both sides will have to live with the
decision that is made by this third party. Right now, everything has to
be the LFS way or no way.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
