Matthew Burgess wrote:
The major advantage to this scheme, IMO, is consistency. Everything
to do with the LFS book is in one repository. Likewise, for BLFS and
CLFS, everything concerning their books would be in their own svn
repos. If you need changes to the LFS bootscripts or rules files
submit a trac ticket just as is done now and it'll be dealt with. No
changes to current procedures are required, from what I can see.
If we have a common repo for all projects, the unique issues that arise
from the projects can be addressed in the private repo there, under a
neutral parties control. Face it LFS and CLFS both don't want to give up
what we currently have, and _/* The CLFS team is trying to compromise*/_
with this proposal, but like normal it's the LFS way or no way.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
