Jim Gifford wrote:
Face it LFS and CLFS both don't want to give up what we currently have, and _/* The CLFS team is trying to compromise*/_ with this proposal, but like normal it's the LFS way or no way.
If I knew what we were compromising on, Jim, it'd be a hell of a lot easier. Tell me what it is that you think is wrong with the current LFS rules (in terms of the names and/or permissions) and I'll see whether I agree with you or not.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
