Archaic wrote these words on 05/23/06 19:46 CST:

> But what about all the other changes? We need to discuss all differences
> and sort out which way to go every step of the way if we are going to
> produce something both books can use.

So, start the ball rolling.

As a totally neutral party to this discussion, with absolutely no
preference whatsoever in the eventual outcome, I am volunteering
a suggestion.

Why doesn't somebody diff the LFS and CLFS tarballs and list the
differences, one-by-one. Sure this may be tedious, but if it were
done, then we could discuss each line-item on its own individual
merit.

Seems to me this is the only way something productive is going to
come out of this discussion.

I would volunteer to diff the LFS/CLFS rules, but I'm not sure I'm
even qualified to do that. I'll be honest to say I am going with
whatever the book says to do, as I don't have enough expertise in
this area to even comment on what would be good or bad.

I just know that after building a current system, everything "just
works". So we can't be that far off from having something that
both teams can agree on.

-- 
Randy

rmlinux: [bogomips 3995.17] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.16.14 i686]
19:52:00 up 2 days, 10:02, 8 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.06

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to