Archaic wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:21:24PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote:
I was just in the middle of writing a (somewhat longer) response that
basically said the same thing. Start the project with all the stuff
common to the LFS and CLFS rules, and go from there.
If it will allow this thing to move forward, I'm all for it.
Even though I'm sure it'll differ very little (if at all) from what's
currently in LFS, sure, go ahead. Obviously we can't presume Alexander
will agree to maintain it, so if there are any other volunteers then I'm
all ears.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
